ALR Judge Denies Motion for Continuance - What am I Missing?

Let's set the stage.  The Government schedules the Administrative License Revocation hearings - the driver's license suspension hearings that accompany a DWI arrest.  The Government scheduled Jordan Lewis to appear for an ALR in Richmond, Texas on April 22, 2010 at 10:00 A.M.  The Government also scheduled Jordan Lewis to appear for an ALR in Montgomery, Texas on April 22, 2010 at 10:00 A.M.

For those not familiar with the Houston metroplex, Richmond and Montgomery are 70 miles apart and according to Mapquest 1 hour and 25 minutes apart.  Now you are probably beginning to understand my question. 

So what does Mr. Lewis do?  He files a motion for continuance on the case in Montgomery because he physically can not be in two places at once. 

Stephen J. Burger, Administrative Law Judge (title he signs his name with), denies the motion for continuance and writes in his denial, "Insufficient good cause."  Did he really say insufficient good cause?  I can't think of much better good cause than the same governmental entity ordering you to be in two distinct locations over 70 miles apart at the exact same time.  Get with the program Burger and start acting like a "Judge" instead of some bureaucrat that doesn't have a clue.  Remember, these are real people's lives you are messing with.

Needless to say the case is now on appeal.  Let me know if this offends you, even the most pro-law enforcement of you would agree that this is simply not right.

What is Brady Material? Here's a Simplified Definition

It seems that Brady material is an ongoing problem with the Harris County District Attorney's Office.

I offer this on behalf of Jordan Lewis in our office.  His simplified definition of Brady material is something like this -

If a prosecutor learns something about a case and his/her first reaction is, I hope the defense lawyer doesn't find out about this, then it is probably Brady material.

This is to all of the young prosecutors out there, if there is any question about whether something is Brady material or not, turn it over.  As a matter of fact, if you are trying to convict someone and take away his/her freedom, don't you think it is fair to give the defense everything you have - especially the information that tends to show he/she didn't do it?