If Arrested for DWI in Houston, Texas - Can I still Drive?

Assuming that you were driving on a valid Texas Driver's License at the time that you were arrested for DWI, there should be no restriction on your driving privileges immediately after you are arrested for the DWI.  You can legally get in your car and drive as if you were not arrested for DWI.

If you do nothing at all, you will automatically have your Texas driver's license suspended after 40 days.  However, if you request a hearing to contest the automatic suspension of your driver's license within the first 15 days after your DWI arrest, Texas DPS can not suspend your Texas driver's license unless and until you have a hearing on your Texas driver's license.  This hearing on your Driver's License is called an Administrative License Revocation (ALR) hearing.

DPS does on occasion lose or misplace the request for your ALR hearing and DPS has taken the position that it is your responsibility as the person arrested for DWI to "prove" that you made a proper request for an ALR hearing.  Therefore, it is imperative that you hire a competent Houston DWI lawyer to represent you on your DWI and ALR cases.

ALR Judge Denies Motion for Continuance - What am I Missing?

Let's set the stage.  The Government schedules the Administrative License Revocation hearings - the driver's license suspension hearings that accompany a DWI arrest.  The Government scheduled Jordan Lewis to appear for an ALR in Richmond, Texas on April 22, 2010 at 10:00 A.M.  The Government also scheduled Jordan Lewis to appear for an ALR in Montgomery, Texas on April 22, 2010 at 10:00 A.M.

For those not familiar with the Houston metroplex, Richmond and Montgomery are 70 miles apart and according to Mapquest 1 hour and 25 minutes apart.  Now you are probably beginning to understand my question. 

So what does Mr. Lewis do?  He files a motion for continuance on the case in Montgomery because he physically can not be in two places at once. 

Stephen J. Burger, Administrative Law Judge (title he signs his name with), denies the motion for continuance and writes in his denial, "Insufficient good cause."  Did he really say insufficient good cause?  I can't think of much better good cause than the same governmental entity ordering you to be in two distinct locations over 70 miles apart at the exact same time.  Get with the program Burger and start acting like a "Judge" instead of some bureaucrat that doesn't have a clue.  Remember, these are real people's lives you are messing with.

Needless to say the case is now on appeal.  Let me know if this offends you, even the most pro-law enforcement of you would agree that this is simply not right.